BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Maqbool M, Qadrie Z. Letter to the Editor: 100-day window: Reframing early follow-up and parental guidance in recurrent wheezing. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(2): 117381 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.117381]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We sincerely thank the editorial office, reviewers, language editors, and the entire publishing team of the World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics for their valuable efforts and professional handling of our manuscript throughout the publication process. The peer-review process was constructive, timely, and academically enriching. The reviewers’ comments significantly improved the clarity, structure, and overall scientific quality of our manuscript. We especially appreciate the transparent communication and efficient editorial coordination maintained during each stage of review and production. The online submission and tracking system was user-friendly and facilitated smooth interaction between the authors and editorial office. We also acknowledge the detailed technical and language editing support provided before publication. We believe that the World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics continues to provide an important platform for sharing clinically relevant pediatric research and perspectives with a global audience. We are grateful for the opportunity to publish our work titled “100-day window: Reframing early follow-up and parental guidance in recurrent wheezing” in the journal and look forward to future academic collaboration.